Quick summary
Our ranking method is built for readers who want to compare casinos quickly without losing the details that matter. The score gives a shortcut, but the article text explains why a site moves up or down.
The methodology page needs room for scoring weights, test steps, update cadence, and examples of what counts as a meaningful improvement or drawback.
Scoring weights
The ranking balances game choice, bonus clarity, payment experience, mobile usability, support quality and player protection tools. No single bonus headline should outweigh weak payments or unclear limits.
- 30 percent games: slots, live tables, providers, search and game information.
- 25 percent payments: deposit methods, withdrawal speed, fees and limits.
- 20 percent bonus clarity: wagering, expiry, game weighting and maximum cashout.
- 15 percent player tools: deposit limits, time-outs, reminders and history.
- 10 percent support: contact options, speed and answer quality.
Use this space for editorial notes: what triggers a rescore, how often pages are reviewed, and how paid placements are separated from the rating process.
Why text matters
The ranking row is only a summary. The article text should give readers enough context to decide whether a casino fits their preferred games, payment method and budget controls.